A commoner Unarmed Strikes are Natural Weapons?

[Hypersmurf]

For me, the heart of the issue does in fact come down to this rule: "A monk’s unarmed strike is treated both as a manufactured weapon and a natural weapon for the purpose of spells and effects that enhance or improve either manufactured weapons or natural weapons." The debate tends to be over "what is an effect" more than anything else.

But the question in the poll isn't about a monk's unarmed strike. For a non-monk, what is it?

-Hyp.

 

[Egres]

But the question in the poll isn't about a monk's unarmed strike. For a non-monk, what is it?

-Hyp.

Hyp, I would start a new poll with a better written question.

Can you close this one, or maybe change its poll title, to make it clearer?

 

[Hypersmurf]

Hyp, I would start a new poll with a better written question.

Can you close this one, or maybe change its poll title, to make it clearer?

Changing the poll title might change the way someone might have voted; does that bother you?

-Hyp.

 

[Egres]

Changing the poll title might change the way someone might have voted; does that bother you?

-Hyp.

Well, maybe we should give them the opportunity to change their mind: can you reset the poll?

 

[Hypersmurf]

Well, maybe we should give them the opportunity to change their mind: can you reset the poll?

I could set the numbers to zero, but I don't know if that would unflag those people as already-having-voted.

I'll close this one and let you try again.

-Hyp.
(Moderator)