D&D General A.I. D&D Session Transcripts and Summaries Example

[Chezzball24]

Did your DM ever finish the scripts or have the prompts publicly available? I've been trying to reinvent the wheel with a very similar process, but the quality of those GM binder summaries is on a whole other level!

 

[Mistwell]

I'll ask him next game. They've gotten better since then. Don't know if the prompts are available or not.

 

[KentHusker]

I am curious what is more objectionable in this use than in, say, your spell and grammar checker which is using similar text training to predict what you're trying to say? Or language translation software? This isn't using people's art. It's not reproducing text belong to someone else in a different way. It's just your own voice and text summarized for just your use.

Besides the fact that all AI violates copyrights to train, stealing others work.

 

[KentHusker]

This is complete nonsense. LLMs were trained to read and communicate via text from a huge number of sources of available text. You know, the same way you learned to read and communicate via text.

No it is not nonsense, it has literally been proven that these AIs violate others copyright.
How do you think it knows how to write a module... unless it has been trained on other peoples work, and likely without compensating them for it.

 

[KentHusker]

Did your spell checker and grammar checker do that?

I have yet to use one, and your argument is a two wrongs make a right argument that my 6 year old niece even knows better than to use.

 

[Mistwell]

I have yet to use one, and your argument is a two wrongs make a right argument that my 6 year old niece even knows better than to use.

Kent, you came into an old thread which was revived just because someone wanted an update. Coming in to moralize (and make personal insults) about a personal use D&D aid which isn't for sale and isn't about art, repeatedly, is kind of rude. I get it, you don't like it, so find a thread you do like.

 

[Bohandas]

This is complete nonsense. LLMs were trained to read and communicate via text from a huge number of sources of available text. You know, the same way you learned to read and communicate via text.

Seconded. It's nice to see that there are still a few people out there who aren't enforcing a double standard

 

[el-remmen]

One of my groups plays over Zoom and I have started using Zoom’s AI tools to write session summaries and they are surprisingly good (though there have been a few hilarious conclusions it makes that requires cleaning up the text). Thanks @Mistwell for inspiring me to try them.

 

[el-remmen]

What if you have a player and/or a character named Craig?

This is funny to me because in the game I mentioned above there is a player named Craig.

 

[Seramus]

A friend of mine came up with a clever use for his. He has his AI record sessions, then asks it to make summaries of specific topics (people, locations, cultures) and output the data to a personal wiki. Something like "Hey Alice, what do we know about Cragstone Spire?" Then it puts everything it can find about Cragstone Spire from past games on a wiki page it names Cragstone Spire. It can then read its own wiki page out loud, or players can read the wiki page about Cragstone Spire on their own time, and Alice will go back and revise wiki pages it has created and update them with new information as the party comes across it (she currently has to be told to do that, but that's pretty quick).

And yeah, sometimes Alice makes hilarious errors. But mostly it's on point.