• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

AAAARRGGGHHH!!! (Or "Enough with the trilogies already!!!")

This is one thing I like about my forays into science fiction, much less in the way of shelf-breakers and more novellas and stand-alone novels. I don't have time to read these absolutely huge series and, frankly, I usually get bored with them. I absolutely adore Guy Gavriel Kay for he proves that fantasy can be one book and still be excellent.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

ShadowX said:
This is one thing I like about my forays into science fiction, much less in the way of shelf-breakers and more novellas and stand-alone novels. I don't have time to read these absolutely huge series and, frankly, I usually get bored with them. I absolutely adore Guy Gavriel Kay for he proves that fantasy can be one book and still be excellent.
But his best work is a duology (the Sarantine Mosaic books).

I'm trying to stay away from any more series where the last book is more than six months away (excepting loosely connected works like Pratchett's Discworld books or Brust's Vlad Taltos books, where there are multiple novels involving the same characters in the same world, but there's no grand over-arching plot).

Designed-for trilogies don't bother me too much; they usually are actually completed in three books, and except in rare circumstances, they don't take too long for the writer to finish (because they're usually not working on anything else, and few writers need more than two years to complete a book unless life outside of writing gives them a lot of trouble). It's when the target length is four or more that four turns to six or seven or eleven. So with a trilogy, I can be patient and buy it in paperback.
 


A good new book: "The Curse of Chalion" by Lois McMaster Bujold. While there now has been a second book set in the same world with different characters, I would say the books are not intended to be a series, and I fully expected the first book to be the only book set in that world. (The second book was good, but is certainly not necessary).
 

"The Savage Tales of Soloman Kane" by REH contains every Soloman Kane story ever written, so no sequels there.

"The Burning Shore" is another stand alone novel (though a followup novel is planed using the same characters).
 

The only stand alone novel I can even recall reading was "Nightwatch" by Rose Estes. It's part of the old Greyhawk series, but it isn't tied to any of them.
 

I was impressed with "The War of the Flowers" by Tad Williams. Especially considering that his "Otherland" series was four books long, and that "Memory, Sorrow, and Thorn" should have been four books long. But "War of the Flowers" is a complete work all by itself, and I really enjoyed it.
 

I would suggest some of Dennis McKiernan's Mithgar novels -- yes, they're mostly set in the same world, but in such a way as to jump around in different eras. I really enjoyed much of his later Mithgar works, much more so than the first trilogy (Iron Tower) and duology (Silver Call) (both of which have been collected into single volumes now).

Check out: "Dragonstone," "Voyage of the Fox Rider," "Dragondoom," and "Eye of the Hunter."

If nothing else, you might get some great new villain ideas like I did... ;)

Good reading,

Rob
 

I tend to prefer trilogies. However, I also prefer to know how many books will be in a series before I start reading the first. Nothing more annoying than getting a cliffhanger you weren't expecting. I am shamefully to blame for doing this, however. I published a novel (I'm not the author) that had a planned sequel, but we didn't tell people. Oops.
 

Most of Terry Pratchette's Discworld novels take place on the same world but many are stand alone books that have characters who may or may not appear in another book or if they do they don't necessarily have much if anything to do with the original book the character was in (such as Death, he appear in every book but not necessarily as major character but generally just becuase somebody died.)
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top