kitsune9
Adventurer
So, I've wondered. There has been some banter about the "Mos Eisley Cantina" factor of... most any D&D setting that's not Greyhawk, and there's no secret that some people don't approve of the Tieflings and Dragonborn in 4E. And the response tended to be that gnomes don't really have a niche in earlier editions, "my setting doesn't have elves" and whatnot.
So I figured I'd put up a poll. What races absolutely have to be in the core rulebook for you to consider it a worthy PHB for whatever edition of D&D.
(You'll not that I put all races from the 3E and 4E PHB1:s in the poll. If Thri-Kreen are vital for your D&D experience, check "other".)
I'm of the 31 flavors variety. If a campaign setting has X, Y, and Z races as core, then that's core. If we're talking about D&D in general, making the changes they did didn't bother me. To me, I would like my fantasy to be even more fantasy and less ye olde skool Tokienism simply because it's been around three decades. One of the campaign settings that I really enjoyed was Arcana Unearthed with introduced totally new classes and races with humans being the only common race. If D&D had did that for 4e or if Pathfinder wanted to do something like that, I would be cool with that.