rossik
Explorer
well..thats just my opinion, but..
i always played 2e revised, and never felt a need to change.
maybe i had bad experiences, but all times i played 3.0 (when it come out), i felt that everyone was a "one army man", and nobody neede nobody.
the mage could fight very well, so the "protect the mage" fighter thing never come to table.
thats just one exemple i can remember now, but FOR ME, pre-3.X games stimulate more group gaming, as one needed another abilitys to survive.
but that was just me
sure, i loved the easy way u can teach someone aboy "the higher the better", and not "higher is good here, lower is good there, and "minus" is good, but nor for this."
but overall, i stick where im having fun
i always played 2e revised, and never felt a need to change.
maybe i had bad experiences, but all times i played 3.0 (when it come out), i felt that everyone was a "one army man", and nobody neede nobody.
the mage could fight very well, so the "protect the mage" fighter thing never come to table.
thats just one exemple i can remember now, but FOR ME, pre-3.X games stimulate more group gaming, as one needed another abilitys to survive.
but that was just me

sure, i loved the easy way u can teach someone aboy "the higher the better", and not "higher is good here, lower is good there, and "minus" is good, but nor for this."
but overall, i stick where im having fun
