Adamantite Bypassing DR?

[kreynolds]

Originally posted by Caliban
-----------------------------------------------
[/b][/quote]
Bahh... Why even try? [/B][/QUOTE]

Exactly how I feel.
-----------------------------------------------

You can always tell when Caliban gets pissed because he messes up the quote tags and has to fix them later.

 

[Bonedagger]

Xarlen:

Well yes.

I never had a problem seeing the idea about sundering. Just that it should be clearly spelled out in the corerules.


There is still contradictions. Thats all I'm saying:

Like why does the bonus increase with the quantity of material. Isn't sharp just sharp?

Why not "Natural Bonus" instead of "Natural Enhanced Bonus"?
(Like in:"It has been enhanced from nature")

Adamantine is suppose to be very powerfull. From meteors. Strong magical areas. Gods? If the authors don't specify this I would say that nothing has been concluded.



Sure. The intent may be that it is none-magical and I have no problem with that. Just with the claim that it is clear in the rules.

 

[Bonedagger]

kreynolds:

Oh no. I don't say that I know the rules better than the sage. But I do know that many oppinions exist. And guess that the sage is just one among many who helped one the corerules.

Unless there is some contradiction I prefere the original rules. I rule 0 stuff so I do have an oppinion what seems right (Even though I probably haven't spend so much time on roleplayinggames as those guys)


I never said he was wrong. Cadian seemed to think that though . I just said that the intent he said was meant for adamantine wasn't clear in the rules.

 

[Caliban]

I never said he was wrong. Cadian seemed to think that though .

Hmm.....

1)"You claimed that you can sunder magical weapons with a none-magical weapons and that that is clearly spelled out in the core rules."

Wrong
...

5)"Do you find me dense, ignorant, blind and pointless with stupid arguments for objecting to you (The Sage) contradicting the corerules? (See point "1)")."

Hypocrite.

I just said that the intent he said was meant for adamantine wasn't clear in the rules.

I never said that it was clear in the core rules.

And learn to spell my name right, or your new name is Bonediggler. Or just learn to spell, period.

 

[kreynolds]

I rule 0 stuff so I do have an oppinion what seems right

Rule 0 doesn't mean that you're right at all. It just means that's how you handle it in your games. One of the DMs in my group Rule 0'd that a Sneak Attack can only be performed once a round, and even then only on your first attack. If you missed with your first attack, you lost the chance to Sneak Attack. He was also still calling it Back Stab, so that should tell you something. Ultimately, after explaining to him the mechanics of Sneak Attack and the various aspects of the rogue that balance them out with the other classes, he realized that his ruling was stupid as hell and he decided to go by the rules.

So, "Rule 0" does not automatically equal "Sane", "Fair", or "Correct", and it most certainly does not automatically equal "I know what I'm doing".

 

[Xarlen]

Kreynolds, you surprise me. You let that pass?

 

[Bonedagger]

Caliban:

[deleted]

Conclusion: Well so you didn't. Don't know why I read it like that?

...I did get an answer for my question though.

LOL. 3 pages discussion about that.

Can remember still being drunk when I came home last night. Could have had something to do with that?


.... It was pointless then. But you shouldn't have called me names... That was probably what made me continue Dunno.. But why did you continue?

Oh well. With that sorted out there isn't really any reason to keep this up so....


Hope you didn't get to upset about this... sorry. Though you do appear on the brink of a hearth attack.


... 3 PAGES!!!

(BTW. I'm ok with my spelling since english isn't my native language (Not so much practice))




Kreynolds:

Ups. That should have said: "I rule 0 stuff so I do have an oppinion about what seems right "

Went fast.

Merely said to follow up on the part that I don't considder the rules complete.

 

[Macbrea]

In truth, Though the sage states that it requires an magical enhancement bonus to bypass DR. I think I am going to let admantine do so. It doesn't seem that unbalancing in the long run. And makes the rules much easier for the group to deal with.

But, that would be my rule 0.

 

[Wolf72]

"~" looks kinda like the math symbol for "not"

 

[Black Omega]

In truth, Though the sage states that it requires an magical enhancement bonus to bypass DR. I think I am going to let admantine do so. It doesn't seem that unbalancing in the long run. And makes the rules much easier for the group to deal with.

But, that would be my rule 0.

Well, Monte said the Sage was right so there's something more to it than just Skip's opinion. Monte did add he didn't consider it unbalancing to allow adamantine to bypass DR, so it's all good.