All the anti-AI arguments so far, in addition to their total misunderstanding of how the technology works, also seem to incorrectly presuppose that Intellectual Property is a philosophically legitimate concept rather than just a fatuous legal fiction in the vein of corporate personhood.
EDIT:
Also. I feel that the anti-AI arguments are being made in bad faith. I don't believe you all really care about the training data being collected in some ritualistically pure way or some alleged soul or lack thereof inside of artwork; I'd wager money that money is ultimately all this comes down to.
EDIT:
Also. I feel that the anti-AI arguments are being made in bad faith. I don't believe you all really care about the training data being collected in some ritualistically pure way or some alleged soul or lack thereof inside of artwork; I'd wager money that money is ultimately all this comes down to.
Last edited: