What AI art can't do. And why maybe that doesn't really matter :-(

I dislike the term "slop" because I feel that it inherently denigrates those who are fine with it. It comes off as elitist.

I think the term ‘slop’ is being overused these days, where people will label anything they don’t like as slop. But, when it comes to AI, specifically AI art, I think slop is the perfect description given how it’s a bunch of other people’s art put in a blender. I can’t see it as elitist when it is so accurate.

IMG_2935.jpeg
 

log in or register to remove this ad


It's not. Its freeing humans from art. The labour jobs will all still be done by humans. ChatGPT can't build a house or dig a hole.
Maybe ChatGPT can't build a house but some of the elements for building an AI house already exist:

AI can design a house to prompt, and upload that design
Houses can be (and have already successfully been) 3D-printed

That said, you still need (and will likely always need) humans to do things like wiring, HVAC, door/window installation, and fine finishing.

As for AI digging a hole, I have zero doubt that we'll have self-driving heavy machinery - bulldozers, backhoes, etc. - within a decade. Program it, tell it what to do, then stand back and let 'er rip; and the first two steps of that can be done to prompt by AI. The only human input needed will be someone to oversee the machinery with a handy emergency shutdown button in case things go wrong or something unforeseen occurs.
 

Recent & Upcoming Releases

Remove ads

Top