Me and one of my player's have had an argument about how to read the following sentence and was wondering what the average opinion was out in the world.
"At each new alchemist level, he gains one new formula of any level that he can create."
And the analogous entry for the wizard:
"At each new wizard level, he gains two new spells of any spell level or levels that he can cast (based on his new wizard level) for his spellbook."
His interpretation is that at each new alchemist level he gets one new formula of every level he can creature, so at level 4 he would get two new formulae in total.
My reading was that he gets one new formula, and that that formula can be of any level he can create, in which case at level 4 it would have to be a level 2 extract if he wants to be able to brew level 2 extracts at all.
My reasoning is the lack of the word every, and in the case of the wizard the implication that all the new spells gained may be of the same level.
"At each new alchemist level, he gains one new formula of any level that he can create."
And the analogous entry for the wizard:
"At each new wizard level, he gains two new spells of any spell level or levels that he can cast (based on his new wizard level) for his spellbook."
His interpretation is that at each new alchemist level he gets one new formula of every level he can creature, so at level 4 he would get two new formulae in total.
My reading was that he gets one new formula, and that that formula can be of any level he can create, in which case at level 4 it would have to be a level 2 extract if he wants to be able to brew level 2 extracts at all.
My reasoning is the lack of the word every, and in the case of the wizard the implication that all the new spells gained may be of the same level.