Drowbane
First Post
I'm guessing people type 2 shouldn't be watching anime in the first place... or be playing D&D (dragons can't fly because...)frankthedm said:Some folks think "That is cool" others think "his sword should have snapped."

I'm guessing people type 2 shouldn't be watching anime in the first place... or be playing D&D (dragons can't fly because...)frankthedm said:Some folks think "That is cool" others think "his sword should have snapped."
Piratecat said:It's great for certain character concepts, especially half-orc barbarians. It's also great fun if you're a patient guy. I'm not sure I could do it, myself; my tactical side would keep twitching.
This would work best with a PC who has a lot of non-BAB bonuses to hit. Strength, magic, insight (like a psi-warrior). . . all these would make the concept a lot more feasible.
Jeff Wilder said:I've seen several people mention that when they use Power Attack, they use it at "full;" i.e., converting all of their BAB to damage. Unless I'm missing something subtle, this is a serious tactic.
Why would people do this? There's a demonstrably optimum amount to Power Attack, when the goal is to maxmize damage against a given AC, and that number is usually fairly small. So what's with APAATT?
Felix said:.... another successfully necromanced thread ....
It is bad when it is overkill on your foes. Doing 50 damage on a hit is worthless when the foe only had 20 HP. High multiplier crits waste even more damage. Sure you might gigasplat a BBEG, but chances are you mulch an orc mook.pawsplay said:So I'm not convinced it's a bad tactic.