Well, they've already done it - Races of Eberron was given a brown cover "player book" look, as opposed to the Eberron line look, despite being filled mostly with Eberron fluff. There maybe be other books they've attempted this with as well, but that's the only one I own. It's a fine enough goal... the setting-branding makes it easy for fans & detractors to identify books for buying or shunning but they want you to buy everything.Mirtek said:Really? They honestly think that people who only bought FR stuff and never Eberron stuff (or vice versa) will start buying Eberron stuff just because they changed the color of the books?
...and with good reason, given the drastically higher power levels in FR books.Bill Slavicsek said:The Forgotten Realms Campaign Guide releasing in August, for example, is a separate and unique setting on one hand, while being totally core D&D on the other. That means you can play a strictly Forgotten Realms campaign, or you can borrow the bits you like best to use in whatever D&D campaign you're playing in. This has always been true, but you wouldn't believe how many players were reluctant to cross the streams like that.
This really makes me wonder about what they're doing to with Dark Sun, or Ravenloft, or any other setting that deviates siginificantly from the norm, since by their very nature they would seem to be resistant to cross-pollination.