Maxperson
Morkus from Orkus
You're falsely equating real financial harm with offense. Offense is not illegal.Defamation is illegal. Enforcing it more aggressively and consistently effectively censors much of the hatespeech online.
You're falsely equating real financial harm with offense. Offense is not illegal.Defamation is illegal. Enforcing it more aggressively and consistently effectively censors much of the hatespeech online.
If there's real harm done or is likely be done, it's not legal.
Is fake news to make a profit or benefit oneself essentially fraud?
No. If someone gives their hateful opinion on a race, gender or whatever, that does not rise to the level of incitement to violence. You have to be actually trying to get them to do violence. "Hey guys, how about we all go out and..."Is hate speech by someone whose sought out the a lot of the right audience stochastic terrorism and thus de facto inciting imminent lawless action?
No. I do not have to get a PhD in Japanese studies because I want a characters like the big wild pretend samurai in Seven Samurai.I feel one can become intimate with a specific tradition within a culture, and borrow that specifically.
For example, earlier Panda-s1 mentioned it is ok to borrow tropes from Asian pop culture. But not to cross the line to the point of misrepresentation.
Which seems like an other way of saying, dont portray something that one doesnt know about.
Consider a baseball team that used reallife cultural names of Native Americans, and appropriated reallife sacred symbols. In fact, failure to "grok" the culture turned out to be a big problem.
You can't yell fire in a crowded theater
Antisemitic propaganda before the Holocaust "made harm likely to be done".If there's real harm done or is likely be done, it's not legal. You can't yell fire in a crowded theater, because it would cause a panic and actual physical harm to people. Child porn causes harm to the kids. Inciting riots causes physical and financial harm. They key there is real harm(physical or financial), not just something offensive. For instance, you can show naked children if it's art. I don't like it and that would offend me, but it's legal free speech.
The elements of fraud are
No. If someone gives their hateful opinion on a race, gender or whatever, that does not rise to the level of incitement to violence. You have to be actually trying to get them to do violence. "Hey guys, how about we all go out and..."
Antisemitic propaganda before the Holocaust "made harm likely to be done".
No it isn't. The vast majority of hate speech is just someone giving their twisted opinion."Inciting riots" is much of hatespeech.
I apologize for not being able to let it slide, but this isn't a thing. The famously misquoted line was an offhand remark in a bad decision that led to the imprisonment of a man for anti-draft activism and that was later overturned.
Bill of Rights Institute
Educating for Self-Governance. Established in September 1999, the Bill of Rights Institute is a 501(c)(3) non-profit educational organization that works to engage, educate, and empower individuals with a passion for the freedom and opportunity that exist in a free society.billofrightsinstitute.org
There were steps in-between. The speech itself did not do that. That harm eventually happened does not mean that the speech is what made it likely.
No it isn't. The vast majority of hate speech is just someone giving their twisted opinion.