Hairfoot
First Post
Please do.ceratitis said:ROFL![]()
![]()
![]()
can i quit you for my sig?
Z
Please do.ceratitis said:ROFL![]()
![]()
![]()
can i quit you for my sig?
Z
Out of curiosity, to which animals are you referring, and what level of intellect do you think best fits them?D.Shaffer said:That was a pretty nifty list, Nyeshet.
I dont necessarily agree with where you placed each critter, but I like the general gist of things.
Bront said:What hapens to an animal who's INT goes above 3 temporarily? How about permanently?
Sledge said:Since animals cannot have an int above 2, the animal ceases to be an animal when it's int is increased. It does not however become a magical beast, unless explicitly stated in a spell description. Since it no longer has a type, it must no longer exist. Therefore any time you increase an animal's intelligence it explodes (sounds better than merely popping out of existence). A bit of a mess really, but still the fastest way to eliminate that Trex chasing you.![]()
No, I am saying those with pro-environment political agendas have often portrayed dolphins in a highly positive manner. If you want a game that has generous stats for a dolphin, looking at the rule sets made by people with stated pro-environment political agendas would find a game that has generous stats for dolphins.D.Shaffer said:Maybe I'm just being prickly because of lack of sleep, but are you REALLY implying that the only reason I'd want near-human intelligence animals is because I want to fit a political agenda? Because that's what you seem to be implying in my sleep deprived mind.
The one that stood out was the Octopus. I'd have moved it up to 2 as the stuff I've seen puts its intelligence on the level of dogs and cats, which I'd also place in 2 with other easilly trained animals. But that's probably debateable.Nyeshet said:Out of curiosity, to which animals are you referring, and what level of intellect do you think best fits them?
Many neurobiologists and AI researchers believe that humans and animals like chimps share in all of the core competencies. The human's advantage is the ability to put two concepts together to make another without limit. Certainly no one would try to claim that chimps or dolphins could have Int 12, or even 10 or 8 if 10 is average for a human. It doesn't mean that the Chimp's aren't over 99% genetically identical to us humans. It just means that even the brainiest chimp is not as smart as any but the most fundamentally mentally retarded human.frankthedm said:No, I am saying those with pro-environment political agendas have often portrayed dolphins in a highly positive manner. If you want a game that has generous stats for a dolphin, looking at the rule sets made by people with stated pro-environment political agendas would find a game that has generous stats for dolphins.
White Wolf stated their political agendas in the afterward of there W:tA hardcover. There is a cool illo of a Black spiral dancer diving with its patiaga wings outstretched right above the text.
Blue Planet is often derided for being ‘eco-preachy’ in the 1st edition of their game. I remember listening to their representative talk about the game back at the 1997 GenCon on how they even got a marine biologist to help with their setting…
As far as why you want dolphins and chimps stated out as near-human intelligence animals, you know why more than I do.
The thing is, I dont WANT to play a different game, I want to play DnD. I never mentioned wanting to play a different game and I'm honestly not sure why your only listed possible solution to my perceived problem with the animal type is 'Play a different game'.frankthedm said:If you want a game that has generous stats for a dolphin, looking at the rule sets made by people with stated pro-environment political agendas would find a game that has generous stats for dolphins.