• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Another Immortals Handbook thread

What do you wish from the Immortals Handbook?

  • I want to see rules for playing Immortals

    Votes: 63 73.3%
  • I want to see more Epic Monsters

    Votes: 33 38.4%
  • I want to see Artifacts and epic Magic Items

    Votes: 38 44.2%
  • I want to see truly Epic Spells and Immortal Magic

    Votes: 50 58.1%
  • I want Immortal Adventures and Campaigns Ideas

    Votes: 44 51.2%
  • I want to see a Pantheon (or two) detailed

    Votes: 21 24.4%
  • I want to see something else (post below)

    Votes: 3 3.5%
  • I don't like Epic/Immortal gaming

    Votes: 4 4.7%

  • Poll closed .
Hiya mate! :)

Ulitharid_Lord said:
I just saw your Clay Guardian/Golem/Sentinel/Gargant/Colossus/Leviathan. Nice. Are you planning on doing the same for other golems? If you are, when will you have them done? I'd love to see stats for a Mithral Leviathan.

I'm sure I'll get round to it eventually. I still haven't fully finished the Clay Constructs yet! :o

Of course the Diamond, Force, Mercury and Orichalcum Golems in the IH: Epic Bestiary - Volume 1 already use this approach.

As with the Clay Construct, Mithril and Adamantite Versions will have a few changes to the core rules.

One thing I never understood about mithril. Its as strong as iron but half the weight - how the heck does it have a Hardness of 15 then!?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Upper_Krust said:
Hey Pssthpok matey! :)



Apologies dude. I am answering these posts in sequence without having read those further down.

Regarding your system, I don't see how it solves the Absolute problem, since its still an on/off approach.

Oh, no prob. Just givin' ya grief. I see where you're trying to go with absolutes, but I just don't know if divisions are gonna be very popular, especially since they don't mesh with pre-epic games.
 

Hey Alzrius matey! :)

Alzrius said:
Okay, U_K has posted the finalized table of contents for the IH Bestiary vol. 1.

For those of us who bought the unofficial release, here's what appears to be new:

The Amidah Template, along with the sample creature Alabaster, an amidah vampire fighter.

Who wields six swords simultaneously and is of a familiarly high-level. Free 1.5 Bestiary (when its available) to the first person who correctly guesses his level. ;)

Alzrius said:
A Macrobe Preying Mantis (under the Dire Template listing); the information for the Dire Template says it will also include the Macrobe Template, which isn't in the unofficial release.

Its a derivative of the Dire Template with some extra bells and whistles, so it made sense to have it here.

Alzrius said:
The Nexus Dragon (ala Wormhole Dragon); this is the weakest (presumably) of the three breeds of Nehaschimic dragons.

They are all roughly equal, if anything, its the middle-powered of the three.

Alzrius said:
It seems that regarding U_K's recent poll of which two monsters he should put in the Bestiary vol. 1, numbers two and three (the Amidah Template and the Nexus Dragon) won, and the Abomination: Annedotus (Dragon Men) lost out.

The poll came out virtually even. But I then rationalised that it was better to explain all the dragon types in one go (you'll notice the dragon info is now 3 pages long), and the Annedotus was not in my 153 master list anyway.

Alzrius said:
Note that there are going to be two more volumes of the Bestiary,

Just for the record, I do have the full monster list at hand, but I am sure there will be one or two changes before release, and there are also few monsters whose names I have not yet finalised (The Elementars for instance).

Alzrius said:
along with a "Bestiary 1.5" of 15 monsters that, for some reason, couldn't be squeezed in elsewhere.

That may actually be 14 now that I have snuck the Amidah Template into Volume 1. The Bestiary, just like the IH itself, just seems to grow and grow, at first I wanted 50 monsters, then it got to 75, so I divided it into two pdfs, then it doubled in size again, so I divided it into three, but then I was left with the original part one being about 37 monsters and finished, whereas the other 15 or so are not, and I really need to get something on sale ASAP.

Alzrius said:
It's worth noting that the Annedotus isn't listed for any publication.

Its a spare monster that will show up on the website at some stage in the future, as with other monsters like the Rocatrice that I just have lying around.
 


Upper_Krust said:
Who wields six swords simultaneously and is of a familiarly high-level. Free 1.5 Bestiary (when its available) to the first person who correctly guesses his level. ;)

I'm guessing 41st, same as Nimrod. It's the only "familiar" thing I can guess.
 


U_K, before you mentioned Black Hole Golems. Have you actually made stats for them, or just calculated how many HD they would have?

By the way, when you revise the Clay Golem and all its other forms, are you going to post (on the website) your formula for golem HD calculation? You show how to get HD for larger/smaller forms using the Golem HD, but never say how to calculate Golem HD.
 




Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top