BiggusGeekus
That's Latin for "cool"
I'm wondering if they're going to be teaching this one in film schools.
My wife loved it. I loved it.
My wife loved it. I loved it.
uv23 said:Don't kid yourselves. The only reason this movie was split into two parts was money. Big thumbs down to the studio and Tarantino for asking us to pay $30 to see one movie.
I see this all the time. I'm guessing the parents can't afford a babysitter, but you know what? If they can't afford a babysitter, maybe they can't afford to be going to movies, either. Reminds me of when I went to see "Natural Born Killers," there were parents who brought along a child who was 3-5 years old. And they stayed for the whole movie. If they take that kid to alot of ultra-violent movies, I wonder how messed up that kid is going to be?jdavis said:One thing that did get me going was a guy who brought his 2 very young kids to see it (I'm talking 4 to 6 range). I don't know if I thought he was more of a idiot for bringing the kids or that he sat there for 15 minutes before he realized he should get them out of there. This is not a movie for children in any way shape or form, of course who takes a couple of 4 year olds to a R rated movie to start with. I was so glad when they left, I felt bad with them in the theater, what a idiot.
The first previews were made and released before the decision had been made to turn it into two movies.Vocenoctum said:Chitchatting with someone, we both remarked about the total lack of any mention of it being Part 1 of 2 in the previews and such. Very misleading I think . . .
Moleculo said:I've heard theories that the reason that it was split into two movies is because if it was one movie it would have garnered an NC-17 rating, which would have been a pretty poor business descision.