Jack99
Adventurer
The errata changes keyword inheritance so using the damage switching power of a Frost weapon should apply the Cold keyword to the attack.
That being said, I think it's unbalancing for it to work like that.
Also, I'm not entirely sure that the vulnerability from Lasting Frost applies to the initial attack.
Shadow Riposte isn't weapon dependent, so I don't see why it gets the Cold vulnerability added. If you don't add magic weapon bonuses, then other magical weapon properties probably don't apply either.
I didn't add the vulnerability on the initial attack. See the quote below. As for the Shadow Riposte, it was a RAI ruling. None in the group thought it should work without the weapon. So, since our DM ruled it worked off the weapon, cold vulnerability would apply. However, I must admit that I think it is quite overpowered. Am going to run it as is for one more session, then I might tell my DM to nerf me.
Yeah, the unconscious situation is funny, and why we decided it had to key of weapon or hands. Else it would have to be some sort of supernatural aura, and we didn't quite buy that interpretation.It shouldn't - I believe people attempting to use that interpretation try to argue that you resolve attacks like:
1. Make attack roll. If it hits, target is now vulnerable.
2. Apply damage.
Just for clarity, I don't see that Jack did that, though. Tortuous Strike would deal 2d8 + Dex + Str + Enh + WF + 3d8 + Str, so his number looks accurate without the vulnerability included in the later damage.
Frost weapons change all damage your weapon deals into cold, so as long as you make the argument that the Shadow Assassin Riposte uses your weapon to deal its Dex damage, it would be cold and gain the vulnerability. The ability is silent on whether it does. It does work even if you have no weapon. Technically, it works even if you're unconscious...