As a DM, how open are you to allowing in or using d20 material?

s a DM, how open are you to allowing in or using d20 material?

  • Conservative - Core rules only

    Votes: 6 3.9%
  • Conservative - WotC only

    Votes: 4 2.6%
  • Conservative - Will consider some d20. Won't use it myself

    Votes: 4 2.6%
  • Conservative - Will consider some d20. Will use it in NPCs.

    Votes: 11 7.2%
  • Moderate - Have a list of accepted d20. Don't bother with it myself.

    Votes: 1 0.7%
  • Moderate - Have a list of accepted d20. NPCs use it also.

    Votes: 5 3.3%
  • Moderate - Have a list of accepted d20. May consider more but won't bother using it myself.

    Votes: 1 0.7%
  • Moderate - Have a list of accepted d20. May consider more and NPCs will use if I do.

    Votes: 33 21.7%
  • Liberal - open to d20. In until it proves to be a problem, but won't bother with it myself.

    Votes: 7 4.6%
  • Liberal - open to d20. In until it proves to be a problem, and NPCs will use it also.

    Votes: 34 22.4%
  • Liberal - Open to and encourage d20, but won't bother with it myself.

    Votes: 2 1.3%
  • Liberal - Open to and encourage d20, NPCs will make heavy use of it as well.

    Votes: 33 21.7%
  • Other - Please Explain below

    Votes: 11 7.2%

Mytholder said:
I'll look at anything. I'm a fairly easy-going GM anyway, and can adapt on the fly. Most of the time, I'm more concerned with flavour in my games anyway.

This is close to my approach. But I have set limits on which books purely for financial reasons. Because we are spread out and different optional rules change things we are limiting which books are allowed until the players libraries are as complete as each one desires. Then we will slowly expand from there.
 

log in or register to remove this ad




I let players use any WotC stuff by default, unless I feel I have to veto it. WotC stuff is scrutinized by a much larger volume of fans, so if something is unbalanced, stupid, or otherwise "bad" I know it long before even buying the book.

We haven't bought non-WotC stuff up to now, not because I think it's bad, but simply because the core manuals and splatbooks are more than enough to keep us adventuring for decades. If we bought d20 manuals, I wouldn't let them use anything by default; I'd want to check it first.
 

I will say few if anything from FFE (not FFG!) doesn't get the stamp of approval from me. That's about the only publisher I'm VERY prejudiced against.
 

I'll use anything pretty much, but I mostly use WotC stuff. The main thing is that my players don't buy DnD books, so it becomes a little irrevevant.
 

I use more "d20" stuff than anyone else in my group when I run stuff. However, I'm not doing it just to open up options, per se. I'm mostly doing it because I want completely different magic systems, or whatever, so I have to use a lot of house rules relative to the Core books.
 

Liberal - open to d20. In until it proves to be a problem, and NPCs will use it also.

Sorry, can't place a vote because of my weird cookie problem! :(

Bye
Thanee
 

Thanee said:
Liberal - open to d20. In until it proves to be a problem, and NPCs will use it also.

...

Me too. I'd probably be even MORE liberal if I had software where I could easily program in rules from all the non-core d20 stuff I buy. Character/NPC/Monster creation can really be an excercise for a DM who needs to consult multiple books, and remember where that one feat or spell was etc...
 

Remove ads

Top