Your feat hopefully allows lawful barbarians to rage?Amy Kou'ai said:Which is the entire reason why I went to the trouble of making a Paladin/Barbarian Devoted feat, to be honest. Paladins don't have to be knights in shining armor, after all.
smootrk said:many of the new feats involved in the newer complete books are just 'rule breakers'. Just a convienient way for individuals to bend or warp the logical rules to make the illogical characters work.
Crothian said:logical rules? illogical characters?? THat's funny. :\
So, what is so illogical about a Paladin Monk? Both are relgios oriented, both are martial in design...seem to gotohether pretty well.
smootrk said:I said 'many' not all. Some combinations are logical, like the paladin monk.
smootrk said:Nothing is illogical about the class combo's. But does stacking of levels for special abilities really need to be there? Why should a Paladin's level mean anything to his Ranger Level in determining special abilities.... Like I said, just convienient ways to 'powergame' a character. I just have the opinion that it is not really necessary, even if you allow the class combo's in question... which I like (Paladin/Monk, Pal/Ranger, etc.)