Ok, I have a question here. For those who have criticised WOTC in this thread for any of the following: dishonesty, incompetence, or disingenuousness.
What do you hope to accomplish?
After that, WotC employees do read threads on ENworld. They might not post in them, but they read. If Mearls reads that his "what's a cancellation tweet" was badly received, maybe he'll won't take us for idiots next time. Even if it doesn't
I'm serious. If you honestly believe, and I have no reason to doubt you, that WOTC is being dishonest when it says that the reason that the conversions docs will be 4 months later is because of jury duty, then what do you hope to accomplish by talking about it? Do you think they're going to suddenly reverse policy and start saying something else? What are your expectations?
When a company did something that I felt was dishonest and bothered me, I voted with my feet. I stopped buying their products and stopped frequenting their websites and stopped talking about them. I went from someone who would regularly cheer the company to someone who rarely, if ever, actually directly talks about their products. I am no longer their customer and fair enough.
If you think WOTC is being dishonest, why on earth would you not simply vote with your feet? It's not like it's 1985 anymore. There are half a dozen very well supported D&D games out there that are D&D in everything except name. Pathfinder, 3e, OSR games, you name it. There is absolutely nothing stopping anyone from enjoying D&D and having nothing to do with WOTC.
So, with that in mind, what's the point here? You think (whoever you happen to be) that WOTC is either dishonest or incompetent. Thing is, nothing has really changed from WOTC in years. It's been like this for darn near a decade now. WOTC has become increasingly tight lipped with fans, never less. Back in the early Oughts, you'd see all sorts of WOTC people over here talking about the game. Then that dropped to Scott Rouse. Now, seeing a WOTC rep over here is like seeing Bigfoot. Considering these criticisms of dishonestly and incompetence have been coming around and around, generally by the same group of posters, again and again, year after year, at what point do you give it up for a bad idea?
So, again, what exactly do you hope to accomplish by constant kvetching on the honesty of WOTC announcements?