Eosin the Red said:
No, it isn't a lie. It is a misunderstanding but there isn't any subterfuge. Mongoose explained within the thread what they meant by "outline" and it is a satisfactory answer - it isn't a laid out five year script outline but they did INTEND to work from 3 scripts and copious notes from JMS provided by WB. I'd call that working from an outline myself. It may not be the technically correct scriptwriters version but it is an outline none-the-less.
This Straczynski has already addressed:
"In your reply below, you do not address your statement that you had
outlines by me. To say that you had scripts, about also which more in
a moment, and say "well, these are the outlines I was referring" is
disingenuous at best. An outline is an outline and a script is a
script. Unless one wishes to deliberately confuse the two to create
the impression of involvement."
IMO, the only thing the scripts could be used for, and honestly considered an outline, is a novelization of said scripts. That's not what Mongoose is doing. They're pillaging scripts for story hints. That's no more an outline than if I took the script to Geometry of Shadows, saw it introduced technomages, and made up my own history for them.
Eosin the Red said:
I don't think JMS calls the shot on what is or what is not canon for B5 - WB licensing already gave Mongoose permission to place "Canon" on their products.
I have no idea how the authorization for this kind of thing works, so it's hard to comment. But like I said earlier, as far as most fans are concerned, B5 canon means "JMS approved". That's just not happening here. Mongoose's replies have seemed to try and imply his involvement, perhaps since they understand most fans would react this way. Putting "Approved by WB Executive #46" on your book isn't going to sell a lot of copies.
Eosin the Red said:
He is clearly in the wrong and it seems by your account he is the one that made this public (not the first time for him). Mongoose made an error in terminology in a podcast and JMS took it public rather than actually answer an email or the phone or even calling WB and telling them to "fix it."
None of this seems "clear". Their history is a tangled one, and it doesn't sound like Mongoose tried too hard to establish a good working relationship previously. To quote JMS again:
"All that I can say is that there has been zero coordination or approvals
between Mongoose and anyone else that I know of. To date, again as
far as I know, WB hasn't been shown what they're doing, certainly I
haven't seen it, don't know what it is, nobody has signed off or approved
anything that they're doing in terms of story, content, characterization, anything.
In the long history of B5, we have never had a situation where a
licensee has decided to just go off and do their own thing without
coordinating the creative aspects through WB and myself. They're doing
this completely off on their own. No other B5 licensed company has
decided, in essence, "screw you, we don't need you," which has been my
perception of their approach from early on, when they first approached
me to try and (in my view) reluctantly get me involved...an initial
approach that was absurd, and insulting. When they came back, the
situation did not measurably improve and the attitude was one of, and
I'm admittedly characterizing it here, sod off, we don't need you, we
can go directly to the fans, who don't need you, we can do it better.
And they went on to kind of poison the well with the fans in that
regard.
And that's where it ended. They've gone off and done their thing,
without any kind of creative approval as far as I know, which I believe
is also a requirement of their contract. Be that as it may...whatever
they're doing, it has no bearing on the B5 universe insofar as I'm
concerned, which is again why I cannot endorse this on a personal or
creative basis."
Eosin the Red said:
On top of that he has irrefutably failed to stay on top of WB licensing current affairs and blames Mongoose for his own lack of comprehension.
Do we actually know that? Or are we going by Mongoose's word?
Eosin the Red said:
Can you specifiy where you think Mongoose is wrong and where JMS is right?
I think it's pretty clear that Mongoose has tried to obfuscate Straczynski's involvement to give an impression of greater canonical merit to their products.
Fans of B5 are well aware of the Del Ray novels JMS did outlines for. So now Mongoose takes a couple unfilmed scripts and web posts and calls them an outline. A slight error in terminology? Could be, maybe. But then...
Mongoose was asked, "How much input directly are you getting from JMS?" To which they replied, "These days it's getting to be less and less." When infact it had always been zero.
The end result is the feeling that Mongoose is trying to pull one over on the fans.