Beholders, Mind Flayers, and Strahd von Zarovich Released Into Creative Commons (Kinda)

In the 5.1 SRD that just got released into the Creative Commons is a bunch of IP including Count...

th-2651574302.jpg

In the 5.1 SRD that just got released into the Creative Commons is a bunch of IP including Count Strahd von Zarovich, the Feywild, the Shadowfell, the City of Brass, Palace of Dispater, Street of Steel, Gate of Ashes, and the Sea of Fire. The beholder is also specifically referenced by name in the Deck of Illusions, and Mind Flayers and Slaad are also referenced--at least by name--repeatedly in the document.

Here's a link to the content released to CC.


What does that mean? Under OGL v1.0a terms like this were generally designated as ‘Product Identity’ and were unavailable for use. The CC license has no such provision. This means that those using the OGL cannot (still) use terms designated as PI, but those using the CC can use the full content of the document released under it.

Only the names of these creatures and places are contained in the document--so you can't use Strahd's image or stat block or description, nor can you use those of the beholder, etc. But it does appear that you can refer to these items.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


log in or register to remove this ad

Also Also:

If Alta Fox hadn't said anything between November and January 26th because the SEC put the fear of God into them, why'd they open their mouth on the 26th?

Did the SEC say "You can publicly badmouth WotC -after- the 25th at 11:59pm." and they just sat in the timeout corner like agreeable little boys until that hilariously arbitrary date?

No. They were in "Wait and See" mode. Just like everyone else.

I'm fine with Alta Fox pouncing now that they smell blood, should be interesting.
 






Steampunkette

Rules Tinkerer and Freelance Writer
Supporter
Your doing alot of projecting.
Do you understand how investment companies work?

You give them money and they invest it on your behalf in the manner that they deem will have the greatest return to the lowest risk. They have a fiduciary responsibility to protect your money and make more money on your behalf. Contractually speaking. Like a -legal- responsibility and they could be fined, lose their practice, or even wind up in prison if they mess up real good.

That's not projecting. That's just how it works.

And thanks to the myth of infinite growth... if a company isn't performing better every quarter, every year, forever, it's "Underperforming" and needs the "Fat Trimmed" or whatever other short-sighted maneuver will net a slightly fatter margin next quarter. Because that is the only metric in the fiduciary scheme.

Did you lose money? Did you gain money? How nice the books look or how happy the fans are doesn't enter into it.
 



Remove ads

Remove ads

Top