Well, early on page 1, I lamented that the thread really hadn't generated the promised flame war. I was just kidding about that, guys.
Actually I still haven't decided where I'm going to get my 3.5 books from. If Wal-Mart is going to carry them in-store then there's a good chance I'll buy them there. If they are only going to be available through Wal-Mart online, I may well buy them from the FLGS. That's because when I decide to buy them, I'll probably want to buy them that day.
One thing that I just don't get in this discussion is the charge of "censorship" against Wal-Mart because they don't carry certain books, movies or music. I don't believe the word "censorship" has anything to do with whether a particular retailer will or won't carry your product. Censorship is strictly a matter of whether you are prevented from producing the product in the first place.
I think that Wal-Mart is engaged in more of a boycott of material that they deem inappropriate for their store. If you don't want to shop there because of that practice, I fully support your right to go that route. I don't happen to share that idea though.
If I go to a wine shop and ask for a bottle of Pepsi, they'll probably tell me that they don't carry it. They'll tell me that, while they do sell various types of beverages, Pepsi is not an appropriate product for their store. It may be because they find Pepsi not to their taste or because it is not what their average customer is looking for and therefore doesn't need to be taking up valuable shelf space. Whatever the reason, at no point did the owner of the wine shop attempt to stop the Pepsi factory from making Pepsi. And there are plenty of other places to buy Pepsi that aren't the wine shop. I'll probably still go to the wine shop to buy my wine.
As to the matter of the survival of the FLGS, I have a certain nostalgia associated with such places as I'm sure many of the other folks here do. In fact, I'm probably going to drop by my FLGS this afternoon and browse around for a bit and maybe chat with the owner. But I do think that it is his responsibility to react to the current market conditions as best as he is able in order to stay competitive. If he can't do that then I suppose he goes out of business.
I submit that if him going out of business is a tremendous blow to the gaming community then he won't go out of business in the first place because the patrons of his business will have been supporting him with their dollars (or whatever unit of currency is in vogue in his country). If they haven't been supporting him with their dollars but have simply been using his store as a place to hang out, meet other gamers or play on his tables then he should have been charging admission.
I can already hear certain folks out there saying, "There's no way in hell I'd pay admission to go in the local game store." Fine. We can then conclude that you place no value on being able to simply go hang out, meet other gamers or use his tables. If your response to that is, "But I do place value on those things." then my response is, "Of course you don't. Otherwise you would have been willing to pay for them."