Hard8Staff said:Seriously, I had to do a double-take on the "r"s!
Dave...feeling a bit playfull and overtired.
Nightfall said:
Ah well that's nice to see. I like that kind of thinking in my gaming. But that's just me. Is the information in the Campaign setting or the Player's Guide?
Nightfall said:Very true my scribe.But don't be surprised if you find a rude person that doesn't know the rules. I'm glad to say the Kenzer guys are among the more polite bunch out there.
![]()
I have seen more anti-FR sentiments on these boards than any other settings, and I don't have a clue why, but I guess that is because its been done amost to death and many of you are probably tired of it and want something new, which I totaly agree with.
What about Al-Quadim do you like over other settings?Dr. Strangemonkey said:For 2E and probably ever should a nice conversion come out, I really like Al-Quadim.
What's Oathbound's appeal? Anything special about Scarred Lands besides what has already been said?Dr. Strangemonkey said:But for right now Oathbound is my absolute favorite, though I do give a lot of props to Scarred Lands.
Why were you unsatisfied? Why wasn't it playable?Dr. Strangemonkey said:Kalamar I played in for a while in the very begining and was unsatisfied, though I like the deities and the names, but I suspect the increased support it's gotten over the past year has made it much more playable.
What kinds of dedail does FR have that other settings don't have that players can take advantage of?Dr. Strangemonkey said:I'm playing as opposed to running in Forgotten Realms right now, and I have to say that I like the amount of detail that player's can take advantage of in that setting.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.