Olgar Shiverstone said:2. It is PC-based. No console-only games, please.
Scott_Rouse said:The D&D (and it's worlds like FR & EBR) rights are held by Atari. I will being meeting with them on Tuesday in NYC to talk about their plans for D&D. Bioware or EA are not working on any D&D projects so the "secret project" is something else.
Wouldn't Lucas Arts be doing all Star Wars games?
JVisgaitis said:From all accounts that I've read on the interwebs, this MMO is apparently story driven and supposed to utilize a huge license (so huge, EA dropped $860M).
From Linked Article said:Although the implication is that the BioWare MMORPG is an original IP, Riccitiello and his associates steered clear of saying so specifically.
JVisgaitis said:Its not their own IP. Its a license. That much we know.
Olgar Shiverstone said:1. It's NOT an MMO. There are solid MMOs; D&D does not need to be one and take on WoW head-to-head (the attempts thus far have failed).
Olgar Shiverstone said:I'd love to see something that reaches the scale of Baldur's Gate, with updated rules, and makes the most of D&D's turn-based combat the way ToEE did. But I also know I'm in the minority and doomed to be mistaken.
JVisgaitis said:True, and I wasn't trying to misconstrue anything. It was mentioned somewhere that the main reason was for the MMO.
Bah, that doesn't matter. Who says that Bioware couldn't license it through Atari? I'm more of a believer because Scott said that EA and Bioware are not working on a game.
Scott, I definitely think your a stand up guy and all, but I still have a shadow of a doubt. If for the sole reason that I spent a lot of time on this crazy theory.Shouldn't you already know Atari's plans?
Chris Perkins of WotCJVisgaitis said:...
One of the D&D designers also mentioned that the rules for Fourth Edition would adapt very well to a video game which I thought was odd. If someone can find me the reference, please let me know.
...
I firmly believe that there is a strategic plan somewhere by someone to do another online version, whether admitted or announced. The WoW ca$h cow is just too tempting a target to be ignored.Christopher Perkins said:Do the rules feel video game friendly and ripe for translation to the electronic realm and were they in any way created with that sort of thing in mind?
Fourth Edition was created to be the best tabletop roleplaying game on the market. The staff assigned to build the new game aren't professional video game designers, but it does seem that the rules could be translated to the "electronic realm" with relative ease.
chitzk0i said:For all it's popularity, some of WoW's major design decisions are really annoying. For one, WoW characters are hideously equipment-dependent. I, for one, would like to play a Fantasy MMO, but I don't want to play one where 90% of my character's stats are based on the gear I've managed to obtain. Also, there's something to be said for the "fell out of a closet" look most WoW characters have going on.
Cthulhudrew said:Oddly enough, the report you link to says it doesn't look like it's a licensed title at all: