BoEF... no splash?

[barsoomcore]

Personally, I want to hear from those who actually end up using the book in their games.

You might regret expressing that desire....

 

[hunter1828]

Personally, I want to hear from those who actually end up using the book in their games.

Though I don't have the BoEF yet, I do have the GenCon Preview and I have already added stuff from it into my games.

I have adopted the Appearance score, the attitudes towards sex for the nine alignments, one NPC has taken the Seductive feat, the deities have been worked into the game (either merged with similar FR deities or added if there isn't a similar one), an NPC has taken the Pleasure prestige domain, and the characters of my main campaign have had a run in with a Rogue/Assassin Greater Succubus (she got away - the Vrock she summoned didn't and it killed about a dozen peasents before the characters slew it).

So there you go. Actual in game uses of the BoEF. And nowhere near as lurid or perverted as some would seem to hope it would be.

hunter1828

 

[hunter1828]

You might regret expressing that desire....

WTF?


hunter1828

 

[tetsujin28]

You might regret expressing that desire....

That's pretty good

 

[jyurkiw]

Edit: Whoops...replied to the wrong thread
Jeff

 

[Shadowdancer]

I personally have to throw my hat in here for Cyberpunk, Shadowrun, and Heavy Gear. All great games.

Jeff

Ooooh, too bad. Your first post, and it's on the wrong thread. Sorry, try again.

We've already started using some of the BoEF stuff in our campaign: some of the skills (Perform [sexual techniques]), the feats (Seductive, Sexual Training), the spells, the items (aphrodisiacs, Gnomish Kama Sutra), Constitution checks for sustaining sexual activities.

One of our characters is a female bard, and she was already pretty sexually active before the release of BoEF. Now she is exploring that part of her nature in more detail.