Rl'Halsinor said:A lot of really good relevent information in these posts. drothgery, are those Athlon X2s for AM2 boards?
Yes; price is from newegg as of yesterday.
Rl'Halsinor said:A lot of really good relevent information in these posts. drothgery, are those Athlon X2s for AM2 boards?
XCorvis said:I'll second Rl'Halsinor's advice, especially #1! The power supply is badly underestimated by most folks. Also Schporto's good tip on Ars Technica's buying guides. I used Ars's guides to build my system, but I made a couple of tweaks to favor a quiet system. (See http://silentpcreview.com/ for great info.) I bought an Antec P180, which has been AWESOME. All kinds of noise-dampening features and very easy to use. The PS it comes with is a little light for a heavy gaming rig (only 430 watts), but it's very efficient and good quality.
I did go with an SLI capable board and one SLI video card, in case I want to expand things later. I suspect we'll see a lot more benefit from it when we start to see more multi-threaded games, but most likely I'll want to upgrade to a new DX10 compatible card when they come down in price.
Don't bother with dual CPUs, either get a Core 2 Duo, or a Core 2 Quad. You'll get your two CPUs. They don't have a huge advantage in overall power though at the moment. Not only that, but you'll likely save $100 or so on the motherboard, and probably be able to overclock better.punkorange said:I'm going to to be building a PC and was hoping to get some advice from those who know better than me?
I'm wanting to spend between $1,000 and $1,500. I want a mother board capable of dual video cards and dual processors, at least 1GB of memory and a couple high capacity hard drives put on a raid.
They're old links. Most of those prices have droped, and some better bang for buck hardware has come out.ssampier said:I'm not a gamer, but I know who does:
Extremetech 'Bang for the Buck' Build
For those on a budget
Neither are the alpha or omega of builds, but I think they are good starting points.
QFT!Rl'Halsinor said:1. Whatever you do make sure you have a good power supply. I wish I had a dollar for ever person who spends big $ on hardware and then to save money goes cheap in the power supply unit. BIG MISTAKE. Your psu is your backbone for your entire system.
Ditto. A dual 8800 GTS 320 setup will do better than a single 880 GTX setup, but you're talking about spending $600 or so on your videocards at that point. It's a luxury, not a nessessety. The 8800 GTS 320 is fantastic, and at a good price point.Rl'Halsinor said:2. Forget the dual card set-up. It is a waste of money. So is a dual card motherboard. The increase in performance is not that much. You'd be much better off with a good single card.
Core 2 is the best bang for your buck, low and high end. We're talking 50%+ performance bost low end X2 vs Low end Core 2 Duo.Rl'Halsinor said:3. As for the dual core processors: YES! I like AMD but Intel's offerings just can't be beat. If I was going to build now I'd go with an Intel set-up.
Raid is nice and fast, but isn't always needed. Newer boards support multipe RAID types though. I recomend RAID 1 (Mirror) is good for safety on your system drive, and RAID 0 (Striped) is good for speed on yoru app drive. Just remember, you're exponentialy increasing your risk of data loss on your RAID 0 drive.Rl'Halsinor said:4. Why a RAID set-up? If you know what you are doing, then fine, but RAID has been known to fail. A good SATA drive will do you well.
You can get by with 1, but 2 will future proof your system for the most part. I highly recomend it any new system get 2 GB.Rl'Halsinor said:5. A minimum of 2 gigs of memory is the recommendation if you are a gamer.
Just a note:drothgery said:Just a few quick notes on what's changed since then...
AMD's continued to slash CPU prices, and has bumped up clock speeds, so now most Athlon 64 X2s are competitive with the Core 2 Duo in the same price range; the ~$225 model is now the 5200+, rather than the 4200+, which gets you another 400 MHz.
The price of their recommend video card -- a GeForce 7950GT -- has dropped slightly, and the 320 MB version of the GeForce 8800 GTS has been released at just under $300.
... and on what's likely to happen soon (in the next 3-6 months) in the consumer desktop space
AMD's ATi division is expected to
- launch their line of DirectX 10 video cards (Radeon 2xxx)
nVidia is expected to
- launch their midrange and low-end DirectX 10 video cards (lower-end GeForce 8xxx)
- possible release a tweaked high-end card, depending on how ATi's new cards stack up to the 8800 series
Intel is expected to
- make some small improvements to its high-end parts (move to 1333 MHz FSB, top-end model goes from 2.93 GHz to 3 GHz and uses less power)
- introduce a low-end, single core Core 2 variant (800 MHz FSB, 1 MB L2 cache) sold as the Celeron 4xx; this will replace the current Pentium 4-derived Celerons
- introduce a low-midrange, dual core Core 2 variant (800 MHz FSB, 1 MB L2 cache) sold as the Pentium E2xxx; this will replace the current Pentium 4 and Pentium D
- make some major price cuts
Bront said:I only use Western Digital HDs, because I've never had one die within the first 5 years (I've had every other brand die on me, I've been building computers since 1996).