Well, My thing is that what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Can somebody get a proper "fix" on this from somewhere?
In My experience - WotC web releases are even worse than published product when it comes to errors, and I have to House rule the living daylights out of any "errors" in the books themselves, using errata as guidelines, because the errata themselves have issues.
I'm sure I'm going to need a hell of a lot of backup on this one with the DM where I'm a player, not to mention My own campaign.
Reason being:
Characters that truly take PrC don't think of themselves as their core class anymore - they have this tendency to focus on the PrC - unless it is a short term "5 level" PrC. These I bar my players from using in the first darn place. Furthermore, when you have players who are starting to list 4-5 classes in their build, it enters the realm of metagaming by design... aka munchkinizing.
When WotC publishes something, and there is an error in it - you have to make a decision about that error. Inevitably that leads to rules lawyering and starts challenging consistency, because everybody wants to have things a particular way.
Heck, another one of my pet peeves.
"arcane spells don't do healing"
Yet Bards get CLW on their spell list, why not Wizards?
Gives Me an idea - complaints thread.