JoeGKushner said:While I can appreciate the note that the 1st printing of Conan had more game effecting errors, Mongoose also did an awful lot to make up for it. You know, outside of having full color art and glossy paper with a pretty big price tag.
JoeGKushner said:While I can appreciate the note that the 1st printing of Conan had more game effecting errors, Mongoose also did an awful lot to make up for it. You know, outside of having full color art and glossy paper with a pretty big price tag.
Akrasia said:Sorry, but I don't understand the last part of your comment. Is it directed towards the Conan game? Or C&C?
If the latter, there is no 'glossy paper' or 'big price tag' (the C&C PHB is only $20).
I am not sure what your point is. :\
Are you trying to suggest that TLG should do something similar to Mongoose? Or that my comment about Conan was unfair?
JoeGKushner said:.. And no, Conan did not require errata to be playable. ...
JoeGKushner said:While I can appreciate the note that the 1st printing of Conan had more game effecting errors, Mongoose also did an awful lot to make up for it. You know, outside of having full color art and glossy paper with a pretty big price tag.
JoeGKushner said:Mythmere1 made the claim that he'd heard it was practically unplayable. Which is false.
Breakdaddy said:Bottom Line: The Trolls could have done a hell of a lot better in the editing department. So, purely from this vantage point, it leaves a lot to be desired. None of these are game breakers (nothing like the huge faux pas that was BESM D20 Revised initial print), but they are extremely irritating at times. I know they are striving to do much better, so here is to hoping they succeed.