Zaruthustran
The tingling means it’s working!
frankthedm said:He also called the PHB illustration of the warhammer 'ridiculously heavy' citing actual war hammers were of the shapes shown below.
http://www.maskworld.com/pix/new/large/a0605-2.jpg
http://www.mwart.com/images/p/Other_Weapons_German_War_Hammer_M600366_1753.jpg
http://grendelscave.net/armory/i/ax627/ax627-01.jpg
That's a pet peeve of mine. The swords have weird bulges and tips, the axes are straight out of He-Man, the armor is ridiculous. Why couldn't they give the 3e artists some--ANY--reference photos? Sigh. I really dislike the strappy, spiky, supersized look of 3e.
Anyway.
From a house rules perspective, I'm all for "Sure", at least for hand weapons. Polearms... too long. Metal is way too flexible--it'd be like fighting with a 10' Wacky Noodle. And if you make it rigid enough to function as wood, it's too brittle.
From a RAW perspective, the Sunder table is for reference, and includes stats for metal hafts. As someone else mentioned, Salamanders use metal spears at no penalty so a metal-hafted spear or axe should likewise have no penalty.
Just as a player is free to say his leather armor is from cow, pig, manta, rattlesnake, or whatever, so is a player free to choose reasonable material for his haft. It's up to the DM to decide any cost differences.