Can a monk take Improved Natural Attack? - Official answer

[TheEvil]

Monkunarmed attacks a mess? In 3.5? Are we reading the same books? Now, 3.0, yes, yes it was a mess. 3.5, no way.

I think he is refering to how it meshes with natural and manufactured attacks.

 

[Aaron L]

I think he is refering to how it meshes with natural and manufactured attacks.

Oh. Hm... well, I still wouldnt consider it a mess. Spelled out pretty clearly, I thought.

 

[RigaMortus2]

The benefit is an effect that improves natural weapons. The prerequisite is not.

-Hyp.

I agree. The same thing goes for taking a prestige class. You can't enter a PrC UNTIL you meet all the prereqs.

Also, why would a monk's unarmed strike be considered a natural weapon, but a normal human commer would not be? Makes no sense to me. If you have an appendage that you can attack with, it should always be considered a natural attack.

 

[Caliban]

My account is.

I'm not.

Then you should know better than to say stupid stuff like "End of Discussion."

What did you add to this discussion? Zilch.

Ah, you feeling feisty?

I already did this discussion, the last two times it came up. Nothing has changed.

 

[Babylon Knight]

The last time i read rules conclusion wasn't on this board

 

[Caliban]

The last time i read rules conclusion wasn't on this board

Could you repeat that in english?

 

[Babylon Knight]

Ere ehty csrt u qere qenr lformerfd itrl'r wr aqwd verth

 

[Caliban]

Ere ehty csrt u qere qenr lformerfd itrl'r wr aqwd verth

Apparently not.

 

[Babylon Knight]

Damn, my translation software appears to be glitchy. Can't believe I paid $99.95 for this hunka junk.

 

[Stalker0]

I'd say both sides are using reasonable rules arguments, and I think both sides have a good point.

So, go with the tiebreaker, the most official thing to ever come out of the subject says you can. Well, that's good enough for me.