Grendel_Khan
Hero
That's valid—ChatGPT as a kind of active sounding board or brainstorming participant makes a lot of sense. To a point, I think, like as inspiration. I still think directly using what it actually produces is pretty embarrassing. Your writing partner is the machine learning equivalent of someone having a mental health crisis, spewing random word salad that you mistake as interesting or poignant. I'd prefer any human's output, just about.I wasn't saying that's how ChatGPT worked. I was saying that people using ChatGPT to create a setting would not be served by randomly picking a setting from DriveThru, which was the claim you made. People want something specific. That's why they are using an AI to generate something instead of just googling for it.