I had no idea alignment definitions were getting that detailed these days.Dimwhit said:I'm not sure I agree about the goody-goody thing. That implies Lawful Good.
Yep. Right in the PHP glossary next to 'passive-aggressive.'Arnwyn said:I had no idea alignment definitions were getting that detailed these days.
I'm with you. I think the book purposely does not include an allignment restriction to leave exalted up to the meaning of the dm. In my shackled city campaign, I play a priest whom got the callinag at 42,. But he got a special message, and now he's giving up the drinking, boos, women ect. He's changed his life around but its been no easy task. He's exalted because he was chosen to be.Dimwhit said:I'm not sure I agree about the goody-goody thing. That implies Lawful Good. If I'm not mistaken, you only have to be good. So Neutral Good and Chaotic Good are both fair game. I agree that you have to be REALLY good, but not necessarily goody-goody. You just need to strictly adhere to your (and your God's) code of conduct or whatever.
More than anything, I think being exalted requires very strict devotion and integrity.
But really, as was mentioned, it's an RP issue and open to some interpretation.
Good point. A good way to bring exalted into a campaign when a PC is interested is for the DM to turn it more into a calling from the PC's diety. I think there more of an implied 'goodness' or 'righteousness' with something like that that fits my idea of exalted.DonTadow said:I'm with you. I think the book purposely does not include an allignment restriction to leave exalted up to the meaning of the dm. In my shackled city campaign, I play a priest whom got the callinag at 42,. But he got a special message, and now he's giving up the drinking, boos, women ect. He's changed his life around but its been no easy task. He's exalted because he was chosen to be.