Can you have too many monster books?

[Krug]

To tie in with Tome of Horrrors...

 

[Crothian]

You cannot have too many quality monsters books.

You can have too many not soo good monster books.

Personally, I think we really need more quality monster books because we have too many not so good monster books.

 

[ColonelHardisson]

Nope.

You didn't like Tome of Horrors? Heck, I even get a "thanks" in it...

 

[darkbard]

You cannot have too many quality monsters books.

You can have too many not soo good monster books.

Personally, I think we really need more quality monster books because we have too many not so good monster books.

ditto. though i did vote "yes" because i don't think i could stand the sight of another unbalanced, poorly-designed monster book.

 

[Zarthon]

You cannot have too many quality monsters books.

You can have too many not soo good monster books.

Personally, I think we really need more quality monster books because we have too many not so good monster books.

I agree, but I still voted for "You can never haven enough Monster Books"

 

[Crothian]

You didn't like Tome of Horrors?

I haven't had a chance to see it yet. My statement is in monster books in general. I voted you cannot have enough, buecause I like to think positive that the new monster books will be of high quality.

 

[ColonelHardisson]

Actually, I was asking Krug; I wasn't fast enough on the draw.

 

[Balfin]

I'm not sure what Tome of Horrrors is, but the way I see it is that, Monsters are like RAM. More is always good, even if there is no way in the universe you can use all of them (or it).

 

[Krug]

Actually, I was asking Krug; I wasn't fast enough on the draw.

No, I didn't get a chance to see it, but I'm unlikely to buy it. Need a monster... make a monster. Otherwise, there's always... the FLUMPH!

 

[Fenes 2]

I seldom use monsters, so I voted enough already.