I certainly am not offended, and I don't think anyone else is (I may be wrong, but I don't think so) but what I think is the situation, as I see it, is that it might not be the best plan to kill the villagers, and nonlethal force may be the best option, also from the viewpoint of a paladin, and I'm not saying you have to do this, BTW, I'm just giving an explanation, but a paladin might say "These people are bad, I can use nonlethal force to subdue them until such time as a trial can be arranged, or something like that, you can kill them, but then local authorities may get involved, just like in real life, you can kill a robber but you're still going to get in trouble with the law, etc.
Again, not trying to tell you you can't kill the villagers, but I don't think it's necessarily the best option we have at the moment.