• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Century City


log in or register to remove this ad




Ranger REG said:
Gee, how long before Altalazar realized I'm joking? ;)

Rule of Evidence 401 - Irrelevant. I want to check it out because I find bickering about legal issues fascinating, whether done by lawyers or not... :confused:
 


Ranger REG said:
Even if they used made-up precedents within the arguments?

You'd be surprised just how bad some real life arguments are in real cases - even when done by federal or even supreme court judges. (Well, their clerks, really) - though in the Supreme Court cases they are often the result of politics/ideology REALLY causing the result, then they try to cover it up with bogus reasoning.

At the lower levels, though, it just gets plain bad. Judges are elected - they aren't put in place based on any particular ability. Most people don't even know anything about the judges they vote for.

On the other hand, I saw a case where the appeals court made the entire response a poem to the rythm of the poem about trees. It was very clever and to the point. Another case was done entirely in the form of a Shakesperean play - it was quite an interesting read.

Back to the thread - when is this show going to be on again?
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top