StormCrow42
Explorer
http://wizards.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/wizards.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=1396James McMurray said:Where's that FAQ at? The FAQ link on WotC's D&D page under Products only shows 3.5 FAQs.
http://wizards.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/wizards.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=1396James McMurray said:Where's that FAQ at? The FAQ link on WotC's D&D page under Products only shows 3.5 FAQs.
Henrix said:A magic implement could have a power that would be usable - I don't think this is necessarily an issue for the errata, even though the implement often would be useless.
sirshandlar2 said:Um, when and where was this specified? It looks like the WotC FAQ is still saying this:
StormCrow42 said:
redrover said:p42, col 2, para 2, DC 20
Seems to be a math error here--the DC should be 19, not 20.
base 15 + 4 (for half level) = 19
If the printed text was intentional, it both rounds off against the players and displays sloppy math. Both of these are unfortunate precedents to establish for DMs.
Imban said:Since it's a point of hilarity with my group, Eidolons, despite being statues, aren't immune to poison. We wrote in to CustServ and received the reply that this was an intentional omission (!) but with no explanation, and on a reply question of "...why?" we were told that it was being referred to the development staff, and have heard no official response.
Underage AOLer said:I believe it is because they tried to do away with blanket immunities. Notice that undead are no longer immune to critical hits, and constructs are not immune to sleep.