BOZ Creature Cataloguer Oct 13, 2005 #272 much deadlier than a dire shark, yes. question is, do we give it CR=HD, or do the unthinkable and go one higher?
much deadlier than a dire shark, yes. question is, do we give it CR=HD, or do the unthinkable and go one higher?
Shade Monster Junkie Oct 13, 2005 #273 It makes a strong case for 1 higher...bleeding wounds, improved grab with drowning/swallowing, decent damage reduction...
It makes a strong case for 1 higher...bleeding wounds, improved grab with drowning/swallowing, decent damage reduction...
Shade Monster Junkie Oct 13, 2005 #275 We're getting there. Do we want to model their size and weight after the dire shark? "This monstrous fish can grow to a length of 25 feet and weigh more than 20,000 pounds."
We're getting there. Do we want to model their size and weight after the dire shark? "This monstrous fish can grow to a length of 25 feet and weigh more than 20,000 pounds."
BOZ Creature Cataloguer Oct 13, 2005 #276 well, the text does say 30 feet, so we can make them a little bigger than a dire shark.
Shade Monster Junkie Oct 13, 2005 #277 So 30 feet and maybe 14 tons, rather than 10 tons like the dire shark?
BOZ Creature Cataloguer Oct 13, 2005 #278 that works for me. i'll work up some flavor text in a little while.
Shade Monster Junkie Oct 13, 2005 #280 I'd work the pronunciation back in (I was way off on my guess), but otherwise it looks good!
question is, do we give it CR=HD, or do the unthinkable and go one higher? 
