Ninja-to
First Post
I can't seem to find a rule in the PHB that says cover prevents opportunity attacks as it did in 3.5. The question came up too whether allies provide cover when a character passes through a space.
A(Ally)B
------(Enemy)
If you can figure out my diagram, a PC tries to move from A, through an ally's space, then to B. If there was no ally, the enemy normally would get an attack of opportunity because the PC has moved from the threatened space in the corner.
In 3.5 there would be no Attack of Opportunity. Allies provided cover for each other. I can't find any rule in 4th edition that states the same thing. As far as I can tell in 4th edition, the enemy still gets an OA.
Correct me if I'm wrong but you can also engage in melee around corners too, but this usually gives both defenders cover. If one defender moves away, given the 3.5 rules, he'd not get an OA either. But again it seems that in 4th edition, there *would* be an attack of opportunity because I can't find where cover prevents OA's.
Similarly, can enemies still grant combat advantage if they have cover/concealment. This is yet another 3.5 rule I find missing from 4th edition (in 3.5 there would be no attack of opportunity if the enemy had cover or concealment).
A(Ally)B
------(Enemy)
If you can figure out my diagram, a PC tries to move from A, through an ally's space, then to B. If there was no ally, the enemy normally would get an attack of opportunity because the PC has moved from the threatened space in the corner.
In 3.5 there would be no Attack of Opportunity. Allies provided cover for each other. I can't find any rule in 4th edition that states the same thing. As far as I can tell in 4th edition, the enemy still gets an OA.
Correct me if I'm wrong but you can also engage in melee around corners too, but this usually gives both defenders cover. If one defender moves away, given the 3.5 rules, he'd not get an OA either. But again it seems that in 4th edition, there *would* be an attack of opportunity because I can't find where cover prevents OA's.
Similarly, can enemies still grant combat advantage if they have cover/concealment. This is yet another 3.5 rule I find missing from 4th edition (in 3.5 there would be no attack of opportunity if the enemy had cover or concealment).
Last edited: