Three_Haligonians
First Post
Hey all,
The 3.5 DMG tells us that two creatures of the same CR is equal to that CR +2. So that two CR 3 creatures (say a pair of hell hounds), is a CR 5.
That being said, I have always extrapolated this system when designing my multiple-creature combat encounters. An example being that 4 hell hounds would be a CR 7 (two CR 3 equal 5 and since there are two CR 5's that equals a CR 7). However, if you keep this up then 8 hell hounds are CR 9, 16 are CR 11, 32 CR 13 and 64 CR 15. (That is a lot of hell hounds..)
My question is, since the process of CR is obviously not an exact science - how far would you take the above system before you considered it to be no longer accurate? Once you've reached that limit, how do you adjudicate the CR for higher numbers? What creatures do you think should not apply to this rule? (either because they are weaker or stronger than normal in great numbers).
Thanks,
J from Three Haligonians
The 3.5 DMG tells us that two creatures of the same CR is equal to that CR +2. So that two CR 3 creatures (say a pair of hell hounds), is a CR 5.
That being said, I have always extrapolated this system when designing my multiple-creature combat encounters. An example being that 4 hell hounds would be a CR 7 (two CR 3 equal 5 and since there are two CR 5's that equals a CR 7). However, if you keep this up then 8 hell hounds are CR 9, 16 are CR 11, 32 CR 13 and 64 CR 15. (That is a lot of hell hounds..)
My question is, since the process of CR is obviously not an exact science - how far would you take the above system before you considered it to be no longer accurate? Once you've reached that limit, how do you adjudicate the CR for higher numbers? What creatures do you think should not apply to this rule? (either because they are weaker or stronger than normal in great numbers).
Thanks,
J from Three Haligonians
Last edited: