Critical Hits - another thing fixed that wasn't broken

Status
Not open for further replies.

Jayouzts

First Post
If you have not seen it yet, WOTC has posted an article discussing changes to critical hits.

http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/drdd/20080104

Essentially, a critical hit roll results in maximized damage, not double (or triple) damage. The confirmation roll is gone.

In the past, I have said 4E fixes many things which are not broken. This is a classic example. I understand why they want wizards to not run out of spells and why they want rogues sneak attack to be more useful. But I cannot recall a single instance where anyone in my group, or anyone on any of the 3 or 4 message boards I frequent, has said "Darn, these critical hits are just too random."
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Jayouzts said:
But I cannot recall a single instance where anyone in my group, or anyone on any of the 3 or 4 message boards I frequent, has said "Darn, these critical hits are just too random."
Just last night, my wife critted twice and missed both confirmation rolls.

Enjoy.
 


Wormwood said:
Just last night, my wife critted twice and missed both confirmation rolls.

Enjoy.
I guess this will die a closure death shortly.

But she didn't crit twice. She threatened twice. And that is more than a word game. If you threaten on a 20 and have a 75% hit chance then you have a 3.75% chance of critting. Not a 5% chance. It really isn't any different than rolling 2 19s and saying you almost scored two crits.
 

BryonD said:
But she didn't crit twice. She threatened twice.

Yeah yeah, I get the math and I get the theory.

But at the table, she rolled two natural twenties which ended up meaning bupkis.

It slowed down play and it wasn't fun.
 

Wormwood said:
Yeah yeah, I get the math and I get the theory.

But at the table, she rolled two natural twenties which ended up meaning bupkis.
Actually, I bet they were still hits.

And I see not all 20s being crits as good thing. A very good thing.


Edit:
How did it slow down play?
That one confirmation roll?

How was it not fun? Or better question: How was it any less fun than rolling a 19?
 

BryonD said:
Actually, I bet they were still hits.

And I see not all 20s being crits as good thing. A very good thing.
I'm filing this under "different people have different ideas about what fun is" and moving on.
 



Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top