Critical Role to Use D&D 2024 Rules For Campaign Four, Expands to Three Tables and Thirteen Players

The new campaign kicks off in October.
1755798535831.png


Critical Role will continue to use Dungeons & Dragons as the play system for its upcoming campaign, with the cast expanding to three distinct tables consisting of a total of 13 players. Today, Critical Role announced new details about its new campaign, which is set to air on October 4th. The new campaign will feature the full founding cast members as players, alongside several new players. In total, the cast includes Laura Bailey, Luis Carazo, Robbie Daymond, Aabria Iyengar, Taliesin Jaffe, Ashley Johnson, Matthew Mercer, Whitney Moore, Liam O’Brien, Marisha Ray, Sam Riegel, Alexander Ward, and Travis Willingham, with the previously announced Brennan Lee Mulligan serving as GM.

The campaign itself will be run as a "West Marches" style of campaign, with three separate groups of players exploring the world. The groups are divided into gameplay styles, with a combat-focused Soldiers group, a lore/exploration-focused Seekers group, and a intrigue-focused Schemers group. All three groups will explore the world of Araman, created by Mulligan for the campaign.

Perhaps most importantly, Critical Role will not be switching to Daggerheart for the fourth campaign. Instead, they'll be opting for the new 2024 ruleset of Dungeons & Dragons 5th Edition. Daggerheart will be represented at Critical Role via the Age of Umbra and "other" Actual Play series, as well as partnerships with other Actual Play troupes.

 

log in or register to remove this ad

Christian Hoffer

Christian Hoffer

More than 10 million D&D books in circulation, sold over nearly 50 years, around the planet, and yet some on this thread are positing, or so it seems, that Pathfinder was at some point in history more popular than D&D.
who cares how many books were sold overall (BX to 4e) when the comparison is between PF1 and 4e

I don’t think PF1 is not D&D (3e) to begin with, making this comparison meaningless
 

log in or register to remove this ad


No one, not even WotC, knows how many people are playing D&D.
Agreed, that is true. Just like it's probably pretty accurate to say that no one knows how many people were ever playing Pathfinder. We do, however, know with some degree of certainty that there were always at least 3-4x as many D&D books in circulation than there were Pathfinder books. At a minimum. Now, it's closer to 10-20x as many D&D books.

We may not know with certainty, but it's preeeeetty hard to believe that more people were playing a clone of a game that at best had 25% as many books in circulation as the game it was based on. That does not add up.
 


This is interesting, again, but it's not data. I like the citations, they're an interesting read.

Again, it doesn't sound like we actually disagree on anything? But I concede that I could be missing your point.
Yeah. Reading back I think we agree. I got swept up in several other posts questioning how valuable steaming is to D&D. I’m inclined to expect WOTC knows their business.
 


Remove ads

Remove ads

Top