The Shaman
First Post
Came across this quote in another thread:
On the other hand, some of the crunch that's been published of late is just awful, IMHO - the never-ending proliferation of feats and PrCs and new actions come to mind.
It's a dilemma, to be sure.
What do you want to see? More crunch? More fluff? More everything?
Part of me agrees - I'm extremely disappointed in d20 Past as I was looking for a well-stocked tool box, not sixteen pages of adventures in a 96-page book and a bunch of stuff I already got from Polyhedron years ago.Razz said:Ugh, it's people like this that make people like me lose out on the crunch material :\
There are people who like more crunch than fluff, you know. Fluff is easier to do (all it takes is an imagination) than it is to make crunch (that takes employment at WotC R&D team who playtest, balance out, and edit the new feats, PrC, spells, psionics, etc.).
In case no one's noticed, they've been adding more fluff than crunch a lot lately. Races of the Wild and Sandstorm for example. I'm sorely disappointed with Sandstorm. At a loss of more prestige classes, they added in stupid text with the new prestige class format they've used with Lost Empires of Faerun. As vast as the Wastes can be, only 7 seven prestige classes? Bah, I feel like I'm being ripped off, paying for text telling me what I "could do with it" rather than text saying what I "could have in my game".
Down with fluff-lovers!![]()
On the other hand, some of the crunch that's been published of late is just awful, IMHO - the never-ending proliferation of feats and PrCs and new actions come to mind.
It's a dilemma, to be sure.
What do you want to see? More crunch? More fluff? More everything?