Darthjaye
First Post
trancejeremy said:Well, I disagree. I can't think of many HPL characters that start off happy. Most are like HPL himself - gloomy, studious, artsy (poetry writing, anyway).
Secondly, I don't see how ItMoM has anything from beyond. Sutter Cane is the bad guy, and he's human. He's the source of all the craziness - his writings somehow become real, even his ability to create characters (ie, Sam Neil).
Thirdly, by the end of the movie, Sam Neil isn't struggling against it, he's enjoying it along with everyone else who has gone crazy. (That I admit, that does happen in some HPL stories, but generally only when the main character has weird ancestry)
By contrast, most of those things are very common in Stephen King's writings. A number of his books and short stories have apocalyptic endings. King has explored the idea of literary creations becoming real on a few occasions (like the Dark Half and a few others, IIRC). Sutter Cane is very similar to Stephen King in sound. The actual town of Hobb's End in the movie is much more like Stephen King's fictional towns than HPLs.
Yeah, HPL was a bit influence on King, but mostly on his early writings. ItMoM seems more based on King's later stuff.
Again, I have to come to a friendly disagreement of your analysis of the movie. There is a scene in this movie in the church where there are creatures of otherwordly origin shown. There is doubt as to whether he is being driven insane or the world is indeed being tilted towards the Gods of Chaos. The ending leaves you this question. Yes, everyone in the asylum is indeed crazy, but what of the rest of the world? You are left with big questions at the end. A more correct assessment of the movie would be to say it is typical early John Carpenter with heavy HPL influences not unlike his version of the Thing.