D&D artwork which captures something for you

rounser

First Post
For me:

The cover of X11 Saga of the Shadowlord, with the sinister masked, cloaked wizard, the lava-drooling hellhound, swirling motes of magic, and the submarine portal-like window. It suggests far-off places to me.

The cover of the Art of Dragonlance, with the massive edifice of the flying citadel and heroes on horseback charging towards the viewer. It captures a feel of epic grandeur and heroic action for me.

The cover of the 1E Monster Manual II, with the grimacing giant holding the battleaxe in a stabbing stance against an oncoming adventurer, cloak fanned in the wind. It makes me wonder whether the giant will connect, or the sure-looking adventurer will hamstring him first.

The greedy-looking adventurers about to loot an open chest in the back of the 1E DMG, their eyes full of avarice. I wondered in the past about the blank look in the eyes of the torchbearer behind them, as if he's not all he seems.

The cover of FR2 Moonshae, with the contrast between the verdant utopia of the unicorn in the sunlight, and the shadowy old trees and toadstools which surround the scruffy dwarf.

The cover of the Temple of Elemental Evil, with the beckoning gargoyles and the gothic look of the place, lit by a backdrop of lightning.

The Easley ink wash artwork from the basic boxed set, especially the ones featuring chainmail or goblins...or both.

The cover of an early Dragon magazine called "Checkmate", with the evil sorceress electrocuting her white counterpart with dark magic.

The picture of the Bogun from the 3E Monster Manual II. To me, it captures a feeling of empathy between the frog and the strange creature made of forest detritus...as if the bogun were saying with a look, "You're my only friend in the whole world".

What about you?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

The cover of the AD&D Player's Handbook. It almost siren-songed you to adventure.

The Erol Otus cover from the Red Box, of the wizard and elf fighting a creature rising out of the underground lake. It almost whispered, "Adventure awaits....read on...."

The aforementioned cover of Dragon with the chess games of Wizards.

The covers to 'Tomb of Horrors' and 'Hidden Shrine of Tamochan'.


There are more, but these just leap into my head.
 

The pic from the 1st printing of the 2nd ed. PHB. The one with all the adventurers standing around looking so proud about the baby dragon they've killed.
 

Any of the interior Otus art for White Plume Mountain. No art gives me that same feeling. It's like looking at a picture of a loved one.

I really like the Brian Snoddy (I think that's the guy) art for The Witchfire Trilogy. It speaks of gaming to me.

The Fraim brothers' artwork for Hackmaster is of course not D&D art at all, but it feels like gaming. Love it.

The Sunless Citadel cover art is terrific for me, because I really just had a great time with that module.
 




I could name a bunch of examples, but I find it telling that they're almost all from Basic or 1st Edition products.

I love 3E, but I'm simply not as drawn in by the artwork. Don't get me wrong, some of the artists they have working for 3E are excellent, but the style is far more "comic-booky" than it was in previous editions. Comic book art has its place, but I don't think it's in D&D.

The older style of artwork may even have been technically "worse," but it was far more evocative, felt far more fantastic to me. Basic, 1st, and occasionally 2nd all had pictures that really grabbed me, that made me wonder who the people involved might be (i.e. the Emerikol the Chaotic pic in the 1st DMG), or made me wonder what was going on, or even inspired story ideas. Third edition art--again, while often of good quality--makes me instinctively look for word balloons.
 

Most anything in Planescape struck a cord with me, but that had a lot to do with the setting itself having set that cord going.

I tend to agree that the 3E style is not as evocative. And notably comic-ish.

Hmmm, I seem to remember some really nice art in Oathbound when I was flipping through it. Another reason to pick that one up, I think.
 

I feel the same way. The 3rdE art is "technically" superior by today's standards ( whatever that means ) but the older illustrations were far better at evoking a sense of adventure and of what D&D was.
 

Remove ads

Top