• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

D&D Starter sets

Stormonu

NeoGrognard
Through D&D's history, the game has presented a portal to entry into the game system through one or more boxed sets. Over time, these boxed sets have gone through many changes (often with some variations in the same edition - such as different adventures or other items included with the rules).

Holmes Edition (1977):

[sblock]
dd-1box.jpg

[/sblock]

This boxed set went through several changes as the game grew. The particular set I had, for example, did not have dice but paper chits (that you would put in a hat and draw) instead of dice. Some sets came with B1 - In Search of the Unknown or B2 - Keep on the Borderlands (I had the latter). Some printings have "Hobbits" and "Balrogs" in the monster sections. The adventure featured in here was also reproduced in the D&D Coloring Book (Yes, D&D had an OFFICIAL coloring book!)
-----------------------------------

Moldvay/Cook Edition (1981)
[sblock]
dd-box.jpg

[/sblock]

This edition was a complete top-to-bottom reworking of the D&D rules and was followed with an Expert set for 4th-14th level (It also promised "Companion" rules up to 36th, but this didn't show up until the whole set was revised with the next iteration). The adventure that was in the rulebook was the Ruined Tower. (The first time I ran it, the group thief died to the pit trap some 10' into the adventure). This set came with a three-holed booklet that could be put into a 3-ring binder, as well as a copy of B2 - Keep on the Borderlands and cheap plastic dice. It had the B series of modules (for levels 1-3) and X series of modules (for the Expert set) to complement it.
----------------------------------------

Mentzer Edition (1983)

[sblock]
dd-bbox.jpg

[/sblock]

This, of course, is the set the 4E Basic Set is drawing from. It had a solo "choose your own adventure" beginning in the player book that introduced you (as a fighter) to the D&D world. The DM's book had additional adventures in it against the evil wizard Bargle. This set was continued with the Expert (X module series), Companion (CM modules series), Master (M module series) and Immortal rules (I module series). The Gazeeters of the Known World came out during this set's hey-day.
---------------------------------

Challenger Series (1992)
[sblock]
dd-dragonden.jpg

[/sblock]

The picture is actually, Dragon's Den, but this version was boxed like a board game, included stand-up counters and poster maps for "Zanzer's Dungeon". It had several seperate boxed add-ons, including Goblin's Lair and Haunted Tower. This series (I believe) had numerous pure modules, such as "Quest for the Silver Sword", "Assault on Raven's Ruin" and others.
----------------------------------------------

Basic Edition Set(1994)
[sblock]
dd-classic.jpg

[/sblock]

This was a repackaging of the Challenger boxed set into a more book-like box.
--------------------------------------

Introduction to AD&D Game (thanks JeffB) (1995)
[sblock]
616OzlNm4bL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

[/sblock]

This version included an audio CD with the room descriptions (and sounds). Unfortunately, if you lost the CD, the text wasn't repeated in the adventure! Also, this set used the "Advanced" Dungeons and Dragons rules, and came with three booklets - Player's, Dungeon Master's and a Monster book, with covers designed to make them look like slimmed-down versions of the PHB, DMG and MM.
-----------------------------------------

The Complete Starter Set: Advanced Dungeons & Dragons [boardgame box] (1996)
[sblock]
starter.jpg

[/sblock]

Similar to the Challenger edition box, this boardgame-sized box used the AD&D rules. Unfortunately, I missed this edition (somehow) and I don't have much more information about it.
----------------------------------

(1999)
[sblock]
dd-adgame.jpg

[/sblock]

I have this set, but I'm not familiar with its contents. This was the last "Basic Set" TSR (not WotC) put out.
---------------------------------

3.0 Boxed Set (2000)
[sblock]
box.jpg

[/sblock]

This set was actually for the 3.0 rule system, not the "basic" system that had grown around the Moldvay rule set. It contained premade characters, tokens for heroes and monsters and a poster map sheet to create your own dungeon adventure.
--------------------------------------

3.5 first boxed set [boardgame box] (2004)

[sblock]
619AY2H49WL._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA300_SH20_OU01_.jpg


[/sblock]

This boxed set came with thick cardstock tiles to make various dungeons, premade characters, dice and plastic minis from the then-new miniature line. One of the big draws was it came with a (rare) black dragon.

---------------------------------------------------
3.5 "revised" basic boxed set (2006)

[sblock]
615ml39TfIL._SL500_AA300_.jpg

[/sblock]

Similar to the 3.0 set, but with updated rules, a different dungeon and slightly different miniatures (from the latest set that was out at the time).


4E Starter Set (thanks DoctorHook) (2008)

[sblock]
51rLaftA3wL._SS500_.jpg

[/sblock]

This set came with dice, quick start rules similar to that appeared in Keep on the Shadowfell, a couple of maps and two sheets of the popular dungeon tiles, but no miniatures.

4E Essentials Basic Set (2010)
[sblock]
dnd_products_dndacc_244660000_pic3_en.jpg

[/sblock]

Of course, this contains a slimmed-down version of the 4E rules with a walk-through/choose-your-own-adventure start to help you make your character. Contains power cards for the characters, tokens for PCs and monsters and a set of dice.

If you'd like to add anything (including your own memories of these sets), I urge you do so :)
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

Slight corrections:
1. Cook was the editor for the Expert set that went with Moldvay's edit of the Basic set. The one that came after them was Mentzer.
2. The expert set that went with Moldvay covers levels 4-14 rather than 4-10

I prefer (and regularly play!) the Moldvay/Cook Basic/Expert sets ;)
 

It is scary that I now realize I started with Holmes edition. I must be really freaking old, but it was fun to look at all those covers.

Regarding the 3.5 set, the big differences from the 3.0 one were:

1. only one set of dice
2. flimsy dungeon tiles
3. no separate character sheets

The 3.0 one was WAY better in terms of quality.
 

I too, started with Holmes, though I really remember (and mostly used) the Moldvay set.

I'm curious to see how many folks had used the Challenger (1991) and later sets.
 

The 4.0 set doesn't come with rules for creating characters. I can't remember if 3.0 and 3.5 did the same thing.

I think it's really, really dumb and hurts the game even if it helps WotC's sell a few more PHBs.
 

Two things:

1.) You're missing the 4E Starter Set released in 2008. [ame="http://www.amazon.com/Dungeons-Dragons-Roleplaying-Starter-Introductory/dp/0786948205"]Amazon.com: Dungeons & Dragons Roleplaying Game Starter Set (D&D Introductory Game) (9780786948208): Wizards RPG Team:…[/ame]


2.) Wasn't the 2004 Starter Set for 3.5E not 3.0E? I coulda sworn 3.5E was released in 2003. (I just commented to you on this in another thread, btw.) EDIT: Amazon says that the 3.5E PH1 was released in July 2003, but that the D&D Basic Game with the black dragon was released more than a year later, in November 2004; the product description on Amazon also says this basic set was 3.5. (Sources: D&D Basic Set and [ame="http://www.amazon.com/Players-Handbook-Version-Dungeon-Roleplaying/dp/0786928867/ref=pd_sim_b_2"]3.5E Player's Handbook[/ame])


I hope this is handy for you!
 
Last edited:

The 4.0 set doesn't come with rules for creating characters. I can't remember if 3.0 and 3.5 did the same thing.

I think it's really, really dumb and hurts the game even if it helps WotC's sell a few more PHBs.
Consider how much of a page count it takes to have decent character creation options in 4e, and you can't really blame them.
 

You are incorrect regarding the pic for the "classic" 1994 set- it was meant to lead into the Rules Cyclopedia (i.e. Mentzer) rules- it is based on the (O)D&D rules.

The "Intro to AD&D set" was based on the AD&D 2E rules, and included the brief versions of the 3 AD&D rulebooks.

616OzlNm4bL._SL500_AA300_.jpg
 

You are incorrect regarding the pic for the "classic" 1994 set- it was meant to lead into the Rules Cyclopedia (i.e. Mentzer) rules- it is based on the (O)D&D rules.
I disagree, considering it came out 3 years after the RC was published, making the Mentzer books even further away from it.
 

I disagree, considering it came out 3 years after the RC was published, making the Mentzer books even further away from it.

Disagree all you like, I'm not here for an argument. It was released because they dropped all introductory versions of the game when the RC came out. They realized that the RC was very poor choice for people to learn the game & the challenger sets were more or less self contained D&D style "board games" (and didn't sell). That classic set was a band-aid to fix that problem. Then they dropped (O)D&D alltogether, and thus the Intro 2 AD&D set.
 

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top