D&D's The Book of Dragons Comes Out in August

A new Dungeons & Dragons guidebook is coming out later this year. DK Books has announced The Book of Dragons, a new guidebook featuring the dragons of D&D. The new book is written by Michael Witwer and will be released in August 2025. The 224-page book isn't a rulebook but rather a licensed book that focuses on the lore of dragons. The book is written at least partially from the perspectives of Tiamat and Bahamut.

The book will cost $40, with the description found below.

This definitive guide unveils the rich lore, diverse types, and legendary characters of the dragon realm. Essential for every D&D fan, it offers unparalleled insights into these iconic creatures that for decades have been the heart and soul of the game. Elevate your campaigns and deepen your knowledge—discover why The Book of Dragons is a must-have for every adventurer's collection.

 

[Scribe]

Is the Moonstone in it?

 

[Corinnguard]

Is the Moonstone in it?

Yes. They're on page 149.

 

[Dire Bare]

How about bringing some of the 4e dragons into 5e? 4e added some new Chromatic and Metallic dragons into the mix.

What I'd really love is to update ALL of the many dragon species introduced starting way back in the 2E days and through today. But that would be a BIG book of dragons . . .

 

[Corinnguard]

What I'd really love is to update ALL of the many dragon species introduced starting way back in the 2E days and through today. But that would be a BIG book of dragons . . .

It wouldn't be a book. It would be a tome. The Tome of Dragons.

 

[Kobold Avenger]

I'd doubt they cover all Dragons, 3e might have been the worse for just coming up with new types of Dragons. I remember there being at least 1 Dragon for every plane out there. Some of them were interesting, some of them were just trying to fill in the grid.

Even if it's amusing that Rust Dragons from Acheron are a mature form of Rust Monsters, I don't think they're really a priority to revisit soon.

 

[Corinnguard]

I'd doubt they cover all Dragons, 3e might have been the worse for just coming up with new types of Dragons. I remember there being at least 1 Dragon for every plane out there. Some of them were interesting, some of them were just trying to fill in the grid.

Even if it's amusing that Rust Dragons from Acheron are a mature form of Rust Monsters, I don't think they're really a priority to revisit soon.

No, but they can certainly try. I think PF1 was just as bad in this department as 3e was.

 

[Scribe]

Yes. They're on page 149.

Anyone have a picture?