I think their wrongful assumption that Wizards of the Coast can take their Rifts IP if they convert to D20 is fueled by a Lawyer who doesn't understand the OGL. Either that, or their Paranoia is fueled by themselves.Dana_Jorgensen said:Personally, I don't care of the people of Palladium books are bluffing or not. I think they're little more than a pack of paranoid control freaks, eminent poster children for the 14+14 copyright law reform movement. And like I said before, I suspect their IP lawyer is a figment of imagination induced by that paranoia. Why? I've seen enough copyright "discussions" personally involving the sembiedas with them making statements that are blatently wrong under even the most basic levels copyright and trademark law that if they are using a lawyer, he's obviously incompetent to be giving them such horrible advice. I won't even get started on the bad trademarks they list on various acronyms and abbreviations, like SDC, MDC, and PPE.
Ranger REG said:I dunno. Most Palladium fans are content with Palladium's Megaversal system, and would like nothing of their games to do with d20 or with D&D (still a common misconception, even among our own d20 gaming community).
Kanegrundar said:I know several Palladium players that want nothing to do with D20. They take a sense of pride in knowing that they haven't converted over to D20 yet, and hope they never do. However, I also know more Rifts players that would like to see a balanced version of the game, not caring whether it's D20 or a new edition of Rifts.
Sir Elton said:Someone else said that she bought the Rifts core rules, hated them, and returned them to the Game Shop---demanding her money back. She says that the Megaversal system doesn't sell in her part of the country. I wonder why.
![]()