Vigilance said:That must be the book James mentioned he was writing next year.
And BK: I don't think Wizards has to support something for it to be "supported". But I guess some people just think they would do such a better job of it than us pikers.
Chuck
JoeGKushner said:Our opinions though, will never change the general perception that WoTC products are better because they are official.
Sheesh, how many books do you need?BrooklynKnight said:I've met one too many n00bs who wont try d20modern cause there are only a "few" books for it...
Well, there was Gangbusters, which was 1920's "Untouchables" stype stuff; For Faerie, Queen, & Country was Victorian; the Indiana Jones RPG; Tekumel; Divine Right (well, that's not an RPG, really)...nobodez said:Anyone else know what kind of pre-Modern stuff TSR/WOTC did in the RPG scene that's not D&D?
Gangbustersnobodez said:Well, based on what's been speculated for d20F, d20P should have a few old TSR/WOTC campaign setting in them. For example, Boot Hill, hopefully MotRD (maybe for a Living Death 3.0?).
Anyone else know what kind of pre-Modern stuff TSR/WOTC did in the RPG scene that's not D&D?