And every edition has been trying to make the Githzerai look more and more like the Githyanki. I remember when the Githzerai just looked like pale and really gaunt humans.A'koss said:Hmm... I wish they had gone with a more exotic style of garb for the Githyanki to really emphasize their alien/planar nature. And further, each new edition seems to want to make them more and more human.
And Michael Komarck hits another one out of the park!small pumpkin man said:Githyanki today.
http://www.wizards.com/default.asp?x=dnd/4dnd/artpreview
[sblock][/sblock]![]()
@ DandD I think that's just lighting![]()
Well, their separation is not recent, certainly.Kamikaze Midget said:The similarity is a feature, not a bug.
The ARE supposed to be basically the same people, after all, just recently separated in a schizmatic conflict.
They should be more like Brits and French, less like Chimps and Patrick Stewart.![]()
Kamikaze Midget said:The ARE supposed to be basically the same people, after all, just recently separated in a schizmatic conflict.
Dunamin said:Well, their separation is not recent, certainly.
If the history of the two races is at least somewhat preserved their divide should be ancient news - enough, at least, for them to have become evolutionarily different. The current edition puts racial mods for githyankis as +2 Str, +2 Con, -2 Wis and for githzerais as +6 Dex, -2 Int, +2 Wis – I’d like to think that meant a keen-eyed observer of the two races could tell physiological differences, subtle though it might be.
I’m not talking appearance difference like chimps and Stewart, more like very varied people within the same general “ethnic group” (moreso than French and Brits, at any rate).