Lurks-no-More said:I like both the new angels and the new balor.
The former are quite good; I like the facelessness and their lack of legs both, as it makes them appear more like extensions of a divine will than beings in their own right. (I'm going to ignore the "astral mercenaries" idea; IMO, the whole point of angels is that they serve some deity, good, evil or indifferent.)
As for the balor, it looks pretty damn bestial, and at last definitely different enough from the pit fiend. (Balors and pit fiends having been one of the prime examples of pointless symmetry between demons and devils.) Also, the almost translucent sword and the whip coiling around the balor are good touches, I think, showing the weapons as parts of the balor as a whole.
Yeah, I'm puzzled by all the "they look different" rejoicing. They're both big red dudes with big toothy mouths and big red wings. So one is muscular and has a mullet and the other is scrawny and has a tail. That's not much of a distinction if you ask me.hong said:Huh, the balor and pit fiend aren't as different as I thought.
Really? I've always thought looked like some Diablo-esque crap.Zulithe said:I still like the Fellowship of the Ring Balrog a lot more.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.